Jonathan Finer and Joe Biden in Islamabad, Pakistan, 2011. <br>CREDIT: <a href="">Official White House Photo by David Lienemann/Public Domain</a>
Jonathan Finer and Joe Biden in Islamabad, Pakistan, 2011.
CREDIT: Official White House Photo by David Lienemann/Public Domain

Jon Finer and the Doorstep

Jan 6, 2021

This article first appeared on the Ethics & International Affairs blog.

Jon Finer, who has been nominated to serve as the deputy national security advisor in the Biden/Harris administration, gave an interview with GlobalBrief in 2020. He was asked about the impact of domestic politics and trends on U.S. foreign policy formulation. Finer's response is worth perusing:

In some ways, the traditional divide between American foreign and domestic policy decision-making is starting to break down. I do not see this as an entirely bad thing. The longstanding firewall between these two parts of the administrative state was based on good reasons and motives. People thought that national security and foreign policy should be insulated from political calculations. This notion that politics should stop at the water's edge is well grounded and well-intentioned. It has led to a disconnect between what foreign policy-makers do, and what most of the rest of the American political apparatus knows about, cares about and understands. [Emphasis added]

There are issues like immigration, terrorism and trade that have domestic components and foreign policy components. Treating them as one or the other does a disservice to the attainment of the best answers that the system can produce. As such, one thing that is happening in the modern era of American politics is that politics is being infused into foreign policy to a greater extent.

This sounds very similar to the concept of "the doorstep" as developed by Asha Castleberry and Simran Maker.

At the same time, Finer warned about what happens when foreign policy is not grounded in an enduring domestic political consensus. It leads to concerns as to "whether American commitments will endure longer than one political cycle. . . . There will now be legitimate questions asked by people on the other side of the negotiating table about how long those commitments will actually endure beyond the next election."

Along with other senior appointments—Jake Sullivan as national security advisor, Susan Rice as head of the domestic policy council—it appears that the new administration is looking for ways to recenter U.S. global engagement onto a broader and more enduring domestic base.

You may also like

SEP 24, 2018 Article

The Ethics of the "Doorstep"

The "doorstep test" requires policymakers to be able to articulate how, and to what degree, something happening in the world connects to the day-to-day experience, ...

Election Day 2020. Des Moines, Iowa. CREDIT: <a href="">Phil Roeder</a> <a href="">(CC)</a>

DEC 15, 2020 Article

The Public Responds: Contributing to a New Narrative on the Future of U.S. Global Engagement

This project on U.S. Global Engagement was launched in 2018. Following the two previous reports, "The Public Responds" includes findings from two surveys taken in 2020 ...

Joe Biden in Ocala, FL, October 31, 2012. CREDIT: <a href="">Christopher Dilts/Obama for America <a href="">(CC)</a>.

DEC 7, 2020 Article

How Will the Biden Administration Adjudicate a Clash of Values?

Looking ahead to potential Biden adminstration plans, Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev writes that the "desire to convene a summit of the world's democratic states to ...

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken &  Vice President Joe Biden in Honolulu, July 2016. CREDIT: <a href="">Staff Sgt. Chris Hubenthal/U.S.Department of Defense</a>/<a href="">Public Domain</a>

NOV 23, 2020 Article

Competing Ethics in the Biden Administration?

In this blog post responding to Thomas Wright's recent article in "The Atlantic," Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev outlines the three different "camps" vying for influence ...