For some decades the doctor-patient relationship has been the central concern of medical ethics. This focus has marginalized public health issues by concentrating on individual patients and individual practitioners, and thereby on one aspect of medical structures in the richer parts of the world. It has often neglected questions about justice and health, and especially about international justice and health, and the medical problems of poorer parts of the world. A normatively adequate public health ethics needs to be anchored in political philosophy rather than in ethics. Its central ethical concerns are likely to include trust and justice, rather than autonomy and informed consent. To approach these concerns effectively it will be important to think realistically about obligations (and perhaps less about rights) as well as about the range of state and nonstate actors whose capabilities might enable them to discharge some of the obligations most relevant to health outcomes.
You may also like

AUG 2, 2022 • Journal
Ethics & International Affairs Volume 36.2 (Summer 2022)
The editors of Ethics & International Affairs are pleased to present the Summer 2022 issue of the journal! The highlight of this issue is a roundtable organized ...

OCT 29, 2021 • Journal
Ethics & International Affairs Volume 35.3 (Fall 2021)
The highlight of this issue is a book symposium organized by Peter Balint on Ned Dobos’s "Ethics, Security, and the War Machine," featuring contributions ...

AUG 27, 2021 • Journal
Ethics & International Affairs Volume 35.2 (Summer 2021)
The highlight of this issue is a roundtable organized by Adrian Gallagher on the responsibility to protect in a changing world order. The roundtable contains ...