Global Ethics Corner: Should U.S. Elections be Reformed?

Nov 5, 2012

Is it time to reform the U.S. electoral structure? Should more views be represented? Do narrow interests have too much power? What do you think?

(This was originally posted on April 23, 2010.)

America is politically polarized. Part of the problem may be an outmoded electoral system, i.e. the combination of plurality voting, turnout, and primaries.

Most American elections are by plurality, "the winner takes all," and the winning candidate is "the first past the post."

The number of votes doesn't matter, as long as you get more than anyone else. For instance, 100 votes, ten candidates; one candidate gets 11 votes, the rest get equal shares; then the 11 wins.

The assumption was that candidates negotiate, compromise, and cooperate until a coalition of 51 votes is assembled. With this minimum winning coalition, policy moves toward the center, and compromise is the heart of the political process.

However, when voter turnout is low, only the most committed people vote. Primaries have especially low turnout; so winning a plural victory in a primary might require less than 10 percent of the general voters.

For primaries, candidates "run away from the center and to the party's base." The base is frequently the most ideological and the narrowest single-issue interest groups.

One solution is to increase turnout by simplified registration, weekend elections, or internet and mail ballots. However, high turnout rates are unlikely.

Another solution is to replace the plurality electoral system. Many alternative and proportional systems are effectively used around the world, and can strengthen the center in legislatures.

What do you think? Is it time to reform the U.S. electoral structure? Should more views be represented? Do narrow interests have too much power?

By William Vocke

You may also like

MAY 30, 2023 Podcast

Expectations, with David Robson

In this episode, host Hilary Sutcliffe explores . . . expectation from another angle. Her guest David Robson delves into the science of expectation in his award-winning new ...

Blue vector

MAY 24, 2023 Article

Silicon Valley is knowingly violating ethical AI principles. Society can’t respond if we let disagreements poison the debate.

With criticism of ChatGPT much in the news, we are also increasingly hearing about disagreements among thinkers who are critical of AI, writes Carnegie-Uehiro Fellow ...

empty United Nations General Assembly hall

MAY 22, 2023 Article

Sitting on the Sidelines: The Global Divide on Ukraine

As a UN vote in February revealed, the world is divided on how to respond to Russia's continuing war against Ukraine. Carnegie Council President Joel ...