Global Ethics Corner: Is Local Food More Ethical?

Oct 1, 2012

With real economic benefits and perceived environmental ones, local food has been branded as an ethical alternative to the mass-produced variety. But critics point out that locavores may be forgetting crucial points about climate change and global poverty. Is local food really more moral?

Food matters. It impacts your health, your finances, the environment, and even politics. This is why many people are turning away from large-scale agribusiness and going local.

Like organic food, small-scale, local food has been branded as the ethical alternative to mass-produced food. Known as locavores, local food enthusiasts insist that it's not only better tasting and more nutritious, but also more moral. But is locally grown food really more ethical? A growing number of scientists have their doubts.

Scientists' first concern lies in local foods' alleged environmental benefits. A major part of the pro-locavore argument rests in the environmental costs of transporting industrial foods. Most foods spend days traveling from farm to fork. Because local foods travel a much shorter distance, locavores say they have a smaller carbon footprint.

But scientists argue that transportation is just one small part of food's environmental impact. More important is how food is grown and processed. Because they operate on a smaller scale, local farms are actually less efficient than large-scale farms. This means they spend more energy producing less food, and that is bad for the environment.

However, the ethics of "going local" extend beyond climate change. Studies show that money spent locally can double the income of local economies. Buying local is also more personal. Direct interactions between food producers and consumers can help communities develop a shared sense of responsibility. Yet advocates of fair trade argue that our responsibilities extend beyond our neighbors. Going local means less business for farmers in poor countries and ultimately widens the global poverty gap.

Against a backdrop of globalization and climate change, what ethical tradeoffs do you see for the local food movement?

By Marlene Spoerri

For more information see

John Cloud, "Eating Better Than Organic," Time, March 2, 2007

Adam Dean, "Local Produce vs. Global Trade," Policy Innovations, October 25, 2008

Andrew Martin, "If It’s Fresh and Local, Is It Always Greener?" The New York Times, December 9, 2007

Stephanie J. Dubner, "You Eat What You Are, Pt. 2: Full Transcript," Freakonomics, June 6, 2012

Photo Credits in order of Appearance:

Wally Hartshorn Scott Drzyzga Walmart Wil Stuckey ad454 Ian MacKenzie International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Ed Schipul Dean Gugler Jonathon Colman International Center for Tropical Agriculture Andrew Stawarz Scallop Holden Rainforest Action Network Steve Garfield Shira Golding Gates Foundation United Nations Photo Oxfam International

You may also like

Satellite view of California, September 9, 2020. Source: <a href=>U.S. National Weather Service/Wikimedia (Public Domain)</a>.

SEP 11, 2020 Article

Ecological Dimension of Foreign Policy

One of the emerging narratives about United States foreign policy is the use of climate change as a central organizing principle. How can ecological and ...

MAY 1, 2020 Podcast

Prospects for Global Coordination in an Age of Pandemics & Emerging Climate Technologies, with Cynthia Scharf

Much like efforts to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, combatting climate change requires cooperation on a global scale. And yet the history of ...

Families partake in a climate emergency protest in Melbourne, Australia. CREDIT: <A href=>Takver (CC)</a>.

SEP 4, 2019 Article

What is the Status Quo for the Climate?

At various points in history, changes in climate contributed to the movement of people and the collapse of empires. How will the current changes in ...