The UN humanitarian response in Afghanistan spans fifteen years during which humanitarianism has waxed and waned. A retrospective look at this period provides insights on an interesting range of approaches and respect/disrespect for basic humanitarian principles. Afghanistan shows, for example, that definitions of what was “humanitarian” have expanded and contracted to suit particular political contexts. During the Taliban period the definition of humanitarian action was extremely wide and covered rehabilitation and even development activities; post–September 11 we see a dangerous level of contraction that compromises the application of its basic principles for the sake of pursuing nationbuilding activities in the service of political agendas.
You may also like

JAN 7, 2021 • Journal
Ethics & International Affairs Volume 34.4 (Winter 2020)
The highlight of this issue is a roundtable organized by Kai He, T. V. Paul and Anders Wivel on international institutions and peaceful change. The ...

DEC 2, 2020 • Podcast
The United Nations at 75: Looking Back to Look Forward, Episode 4, with Bertrand Ramcharan
Bertrand Ramcharan, former acting high commissioner for human rights, discusses why he thinks the "UN human rights system is in crisis" and details the complicated ...

NOV 12, 2020 • Podcast
The United Nations at 75: Looking Back to Look Forward, Episode 3, with Noeleen Heyzer
Noeleen Heyzer, former executive director of the United Nations Development Fund for Women, discuss the role of women in the UN over the years. Heyzer ...