Global Ethics Corner: Vigilante Justice: Have Libyans' Demands for Retribution Gone Too Far?

May 11, 2012

Libya's civil war is over, but many victims of the Qaddafi regime are still violently meting out justice to their former oppressors. Will this just lead to a vicious cycle of abuse in the North African state? How can Libya balance the victims' needs with the perpetrators' basic human rights?

Libya's civil war may be over, but the country has still not attained true peace.

It's been six months since rebel forces liberated Libya and yet the country has no unified army or government. Instead, armed militias control the country's towns and villages. Unfettered by the rule of law, they take justice into their own hands.

Their first targets? Loyalists of former Libyan ruler Muammar Qaddafi, who led the decades-long assault on Libya's civilian population. In meting out vigilante justice, some analysts say Libya's militias are delivering punishments that meet the definition of torture.

Thirty thousand Libyans died during the country's eight-month civil war. Thousands more were tortured, killed, and oppressed throughout Qaddafi's three-decade-long rule. No one expected that emerging from such a violent history would be easy. Post-conflict transitions are inevitably painful and slow. Bringing justice for crimes committed in a former regime's name with fairness and respect can be tremendously difficult.

But human rights advocates warn that Libya's response is especially bad. Amnesty International says militias are on a rampage. They've uncovered evidence of former Qaddafi loyalists being unlawfully detained, tortured, and killed. According to reports in The New York Times, victims are being encouraged to confront former torturers and inflict similar crimes on them.

Libya's transitional authorities show little interest in dealing fairly with the past. In May, they granted immunity to all rebel fighters for crimes committed during the civil war.

Critics say such practices risk perpetuating violence in Libya. They say Libyans need to embrace the rule of law and stop all forms of abuse—regardless of the victim.

What do you think? How can Libya better balance the needs of victims with the rights of perpetrators?

By Marlene Spoerri

For more information see

"Libya: 'Out of control' militias commit widespread abuses, a year on from uprising," Amnesty International, February 15, 2012

Robert F. Worth, "In Libya, the Captors Have Become the Captive," The New York Times, May 9, 2012

Photo Credits in Order of Appearance:
Ammar Abd Rabbo [also for pictures 2, 5, 8, 9, & 10)
James (Jim) Gordon
IOPCR
Dave King
Haxorjoe

You may also like

APR 30, 2024 Podcast

Is AI Just an Artifact? with Joanna Bryson

In this episode, host Anja Kaspersen is joined by Hertie School's Joanna Bryson to discuss the intersection of computational, cognitive, and behavioral sciences, and AI.

FEB 27, 2024 Video

A Carnegie Council Conversation with the UK Home Secretary

In this speech, the UK Home Secretary outlined the range of opportunities and challenges faced by countries as a consequence of migration.

FEB 15, 2024 Video

Charles W. Kegley, Jr. Lecture Series: A Place for Ethics in World Politics

In the inaugural Charles W. Kegley, Jr. Lecture, Stephen Hibbard, former chair of Carnegie Council, discusses "A Place for Ethics in World Politics."

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation