Global Ethics Corner: When Are Drones Strikes Ethical?

May 4, 2012

President Obama's top counterterrorism adviser recently defended drone strikes, saying they are legal, wise, and moral. But, citing international law, many critics question this approach, especially in a non-combat zone like Pakistan. Is it ethically problematic to rely on drone strikes?

Once the stuff of science fiction, unmanned, remotely piloted aircraft have emerged over the last decade as an integral part of the United States' military strategy in the so-called "war on terror."

Targeted drone strikes have been used to kill Islamic militants in Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, and elsewhere.

But the American government never formally acknowledged the use of drones against al-Qaeda.

Until now.

President Obama's top counterterrorism adviser John O. Brennan recently gave a speech defending the use of drones. Brennan said the Obama administration believes targeted drone strikes are not only legal and wise, but ethical as well.

He pointed to three key principles that the administration considers when planning a targeted drone strike. First, there's the principle of necessity. By that he means that the target should have a definite military value. Second, there's the principle of distinction, which means that only military objectives, not civilians, should be targeted. And finally, there's the principle of proportionality—meaning that you only want to strike when the military benefits outweigh the potential collateral damage.

Brennan points to an overarching moral principle of humanity. He says these drone strikes won't inflict unnecessary suffering, and therefore they are ethical and just.

Critics of drone strikes disagree, citing international law, which they say prohibits "unlawful killing."

Drone strikes inside combat zones like Afghanistan may be ethical if they conform to established notions of just war theory.

But, these critics say, drone strikes in non-combat zones like Pakistan are ethically problematic.

What do you think? Is the Obama administration right? Are drone strikes ethical?

Photo Credits in Order of Appearance:
james_gordon_los_angeles [also for photo 12]
Gerald Nino, CBP/U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security
Pete Souza/White House [also for photos 4 & 5]
The U.S. Army
Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod/U.S. Army
Spc. David A. Jackson/U.S. Army
CODEPINK Women For Peace
Staff Sgt. Michael L. Casteel/U.S. Army
Christian Payne

You may also like

Brandenburg Gate in Berlin in lit up in Ukraine's colors, February 2022.

JAN 26, 2023 Article

Is the West at "war" with Russia?

What does it mean precisely when German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock says that the Euro-Atlantic community finds itself at "war” with Russia in Ukraine? Senior ...

JAN 27, 2022 Podcast

The Doorstep: The Hidden Global Growth Crisis, with Rachel Ziemba

Over the past year, America has imported more oil from Russia and goods from China to address domestic inflation and supply chain issues. Abroad, the ...

President Biden observes vaccine dosage preparations at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Maryland, January 29, 2021. CREDIT: <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/51145157658/">Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz</a> (<a href="https://www.usa.gov/government-works">U.S. Government Works</a>)

MAY 19, 2021 Article

Vaccine Nationalism versus Vaccine Diplomacy

Health security is a fundamental "doorstep" issue in terms of the intersection of domestic and foreign policy. In this blog post, U.S. Global Engagement ...

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation