Global Ethics Corner: How Should the U.S. Handle Islamic Terrorists?

Nov 4, 2011

The fact that Guantanamo remains open, although the number of prisoners has been greatly reduced, shows how difficult it is to handle Islamic militants. Meanwhile, targeted killings have increased. Are we killing our high-profile enemies to avoid sending them to military prison?

It has been a particularly deadly year for militant Islamic opponents of U.S. military power.

First, in May, Navy SEALS killed al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden in a safe house in Pakistan. Then, in June, U.S. drone missiles killed three senior al-Qaeda operatives in Yemen. A similar fate befell the Yemeni-American imam Anwar al-Awlaki in September. That same month, drones killed al-Qaeda chief operations officer Abu Hafs al Shahri in Pakistan.

According to USAToday reporter David Jackson, about 20 senior al-Qaeda leaders have been targeted and killed by American forces since 2009. This record of success has broad domestic support. An October poll found that 63 percent of the country approves of the way the current administration is handling the war on terrorism.

These high-profile targets mark a departure, however. Previously, many of the ethical dilemmas presented by the War on Terrorism centered on the treatment of detainees. Was it legal to imprison enemy combatants offshore in Guantanamo Bay or at CIA "black sites" in foreign lands? Did the so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" approved by Justice Department lawyers amount to torture?

Many thought that they did. But this debate has receded, as targeted killings have become the norm. Guantanamo Bay once housed nearly 450 prisoners, and that population has been reduced to about 175 in the past few years. But the fact that offshore U.S. military prisons remain open is testament to the difficult question of how to properly handle Islamic militants bent on destroying Western civilization.

Another difficult question looms just as large: Are we killing our most high-profile enemies to avoid sending them to military prison? What do you think?

For more information see

David Jackson, "Obama's Terrorist Hit List Grows," USAToday, September 30, 2011

Gerald Seib, "Domestic Woes Sideline Foreign Policy," The Wall Street Journal, November 1, 2011

Photo Credits in Order of Appearance:

Pete Souza
Abdul Rahman bin Laden
Muhammad ud-Deen
Staff Sgt. Stacy L. Pearsall/U.S. Air Force
Josh Pesavento
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Petty Officer 1st class Shane T. McCoy/U.S. Navy
Cherie A. Thurlby/Department of Defense, PD
Ron Sachs/CNP/Corbis
Erwin Lux
Pete Souza

You may also like

Detail from book cover.

DEC 15, 2021 Podcast

Is Militarization Essential for Security in 2022 and Beyond?

In the last 20 years, the U.S. and its allies significantly expanded their military and security infrastructures. But as America pivots from the War on ...

MAR 26, 2021 Podcast

The Doorstep: Assessing Trump's Legacy on Biden's Foreign Policy, with George Mason's Colin Dueck

The Biden-Harris administration made a host of foreign policy promises for their first 100 days in office. Leading the list was linking foreign and domestic policy ...

Donald Trump & Xi Jinping in Beijing, November 2017. CREDIT: <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/more-photos-foreign-trip/">Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks</a>.

SEP 25, 2020 Article

Searching for a Post-Pandemic Order

In this blog post, Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev reflects on his recent webinar with Ali Wyne of the Atlantic Council. What will the role of ...