Global Ethics Corner: The Debt Crisis: Are Politicians the Problem?

Aug 12, 2011

Instead of taking a leadership role, U.S. politicians merely "kicked the can down the road" to resolve the debt ceiling crisis, kicking off a U.S. credit rating downgrade and a global stock market meltdown. Should the U.S. government be given more or less authority in light of recent events?

The American debt ceiling standoff and a possible Greek default were resolved by agreements to 'kick the can down the road,' and leave the difficult choices for tomorrow.

Two results were the downgrade of the U.S. credit rating and a global stock market meltdown. Ironically, most commentators and politicians saw these crashes coming.

Why weren't these train wrecks avoided?

The Economist says, "Now the politicians have become the problem."

It compares European and American policies to Japanese actions during their last two disastrous decades. It notes, "Japan has mostly been led by a string of consensus-seekers. ...Mr. Obama and Mrs. Merkel are better at following public opinion than leading it."

However, blaming our leaders may be too easy an answer. If leaders are to blame, then we only have to throw the bums out. Unfortunately, the next set of bums seems to be equally ineffective.

There are other possible villains.

The Economist also notes, "The problem lies not just in the personalities involved, but also in the political structures ... in part because partisan redistricting has handed power over to the extremes."

In addition, technology fragmented public space, competition pushed media into narrower and more hyperbolic trajectories, issues impassioned fringes, the moderate center lost its voice, and democracy paralyzed itself.

The Economist reflects, "No wonder China's autocrats ... feel as if the future is on their side."

What would you accept to solve today's monumental problems—a more authoritarian government? Alternatively, is less government possible given the train wrecks looming ahead? If the future demands strong leaders, how strong should they be, and would you abide by their decisions?

By William Vocke

For more information see:

"Turning Japanese: The absence of leadership in the West is frightening—and also rather familiar," The Economist, July 30, 2011, p.7–8.

Photo Credits in order of Appearance:

Peter Souza
thaigov
Peter Souza
Remi Steinegger
Peter Souza
Lawrence Jackson
Peter Souza
Kyle Moore
Samantha Appleton
Peter Souza

You may also like

SEP 29, 2022 Article

Long-termism: An Ethical Trojan Horse

"Long-termism," the idea that the fate of humanity should be our top moral priority, has gained prominence recently in the writings of philosopher William MacAskill ...

SEP 26, 2022 Podcast

C2GTalk: How can countries work together to tackle climate change? with Sunita Narain

Countries need to set aside their differences, recognize their interdependence, and negotiate as equals to tackle the climate crisis, says Sunita Narain, the director general ...

SEP 23, 2022 Article

Autocrats, Oligarchs, and Us: A Moment of Crisis for Responsible Internationalism

As world leaders meet in New York for the UN General Assembly, it is clear that responsible internationalism is in crisis. Carnegie Council President Joel ...