Global Ethics Corner: America on a Global Ethics Thermometer: Image and Reality

Feb 25, 2011

How well do the institutions of government live up to the expectations of their people? What has America got right? What should it change? How do other countries measure up?

Who are the good guys and bad guys in international affairs? How do countries stack up?

The issue is not patriotism or nationalism. Most want to honor their country. Nor is the issue development, the level of wealth.

The issue is how well do the institutions of government live up to expectations?

Of course, expectations and their evaluation are tied to personal values, but most people have a sense of ethical state behavior. In people's minds some countries succeed, many fail, and most fall in between. Switzerland is seen by most as a success, Libya is an example of failure.

There are many objective indices for evaluating a country's behavior. Among them are: life expectancy at birth, economic transparency, educational performance, personal security, income equality, opportunity for advancement, [infant mortality, human rights protection, level of development, growth, environmental impact], etc.

People choose different combinations when they judge. Charles Blow in The New York Times uses nine indices to evaluate 33 countries, and concludes regarding the U.S. that "It's time for us to stop lying to ourselves about this country. …on a whole host of measures… we are among the worst of the worst." [The title is equally provocative, "Empire at the End of Decadence: American Shame."]

This is a stunning conclusion to many Americans. Is the U.S. number one only in its own eyes?

Think critically for a moment not about the America we love, but about the America depicted by dozens of indices. Is Blow right? If so, why do people around the world want to immigrate to the U.S.? What has America gotten right? What should change?

By William Vocke

For more information see:

Charles M. Blow, "Empire at the End of Decadence: American Shame," The New York Times, February 19, 2011, p. A19.

Photo Credits in order of Appearance:

Banalities
C-reel.com
M.V. Jantzen
José Cruz/ABr
Maggie Osama
Thinkstock/Polka Dot
UggBoy?UggGirl

Hajime Nakano
Sorent
Panagiotis V. Lazaridis
Sbw01f
Sbw01f
Alessandro
-{ thus }-
The U.S. Army
Gary McCabe
Mark Heard
The U.S. Army


http://www.flickr.com/photos/aeturnum/675199030/

You may also like

OCT 7, 2024 Video

Science Summit at UNGA79: Brain Economy Paradigm Shift for Democratic Renewal

As part of the 2024 UN Science Summit at the 79th UNGA, Joel Rosenthal discussed how democratic systems can prosper in the age of technological acceleration.

CREDIT: Abobe/hamara.

SEP 25, 2024 Article

Politico Op-Ed: Walking a Fraying Nuclear Tightrope

In a new op-ed, Carnegie Council President Joel Rosenthal argues that a recommitment to nuclear arms control is nothing short of a moral imperative.

Left to Right: Eleonore Fournier-Tombs, Ambassador Chola Milambo, Ambassador Anna Karin Eneström, Doreen Bogdan-Martin, Vilas Dhar. CREDIT: Bryan Goldberg.

SEP 19, 2024 Video

Unlocking Cooperation: AI for All

On the eve of the Summit of the Future, Carnegie Council & UNU-CPR hosted a special event exploring the implications of AI for the multilateral system.

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation