Global Ethics Corner: WTO and the Washington vs. Beijing Consensus

Nov 19, 2010

With the rise in power of emerging markets and developing economies should the architecture of global economics change to reflect their market approaches? Should the U.S. direct reforms, or should China and other developing markets take leadership?

Does the WTO facilitate a fair trade system for both developed and developing countries?

Countries' economies follow international economic architectures that are successful. Communism failed and the current economic crisis—cultivated in the United States—demonstrates many flaws in relatively unregulated capitalism.

In The Wall Street Journal, Yasheng Huang notes that "the so-called Beijing Consensus has proved its superiority over the deregulated capitalism of the Washington Consensus after the recent financial crisis."

This alternative focuses on the importance of the state in directing and impelling economic growth is inherently more authoritarian. China's economic success is the core illustration of this model, but it is being embraced by many developing countries. The authoritarian political process is often attractive to elites, while the confusion, pain, and lack of direction in creative capitalism are often seen as too high a cost to bear.

Opinions about the efficiency of the WTO and the Bretton Woods institutions, hence, divide along the dichotomy between approaches, captured in these caricatures of Washington vs. Beijing.

Regardless of the approach you find most appropriate, developing countries will play a significant role in the future. The emergence of Brazil, Russia, India, and China is gradually shifting global interests. The global economy is changing; therefore, perhaps the rules of the game should change as well.

What do you think? Should the Washington Consensus be reformed, perhaps by the U.S.? Should Beijing or other emerging powers take the lead in the reforming the current global economic architecture?

By Francisco Eguiguren and William Vocke

For more information see:

Huang, Yasheng. "Chinomics: The Fallacy of the Beijing Consensus." The Wall Street Journal, June 19, 2010.

Photo Credits in order of Appearance:

World Trade Organization
Benjamin Dumas
Jonny White
Pete Souza
Fran Simo
Wolfgang Staudt
Chuck Kennedy
Pete Souza
Pete Souza
Pete Souza
Qilai Shen/ World Economic Forum

You may also like

JUN 14, 2024 Article

A Conversation with Carnegie Ethics Fellow Sophie Flint

This interview series profiles members of the inaugural Carnegie Ethics Fellows cohort. This discussion features Sophie Flint, a a project manager for Strategic Resource Group.

Left to Right: Nikolas Gvosdev, Tatiana Serafin, Peter Goodman. CREDIT: Noha Mahmoud.

JUN 13, 2024 Podcast

How the World Ran Out of Everything, with Peter S. Goodman

In the final "Doorstep" podcast, "New York Times" reporter Peter Goodman discusses how geopolitics is connected to the goods that end up on our doorstep.

JUN 4, 2024 Article

Space-Based Data Risks to Refugee Populations

Space-based data is quite useful for observing environmental conditions, but Zhanna Malekos Smith writes that it also raises privacy concerns for vulnerable populations.

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation