Global Ethics Corner: China and the U.S.: Trade Wars or Mutual Advantage

Oct 1, 2010

China undervalues its currency and pursues an export-led growth model, resulting in the loss of U.S. jobs. Confrontation on this issue is dangerous, yet doing nothing is potentially disastrous for the U.S. economy. How would you respond to China's growing power?

Does a "dreadful choice" face the U.S. in its trading relationship with China?

Samuelson in The Washington Post argues for standing up to China. He sees the U.S. damaged by Chinese political choices.

China undervalues its currency and pursues an export-led growth model. Both lead to the loss of U.S. jobs, an imbalanced trading system, and an American disadvantage. Rather than following the rules of mutual advantage, China cherry picks benefits and increasingly asserts its prerogatives.

Samuleson suggests that the U.S. needs to confront China or to allow China to "remake the trading system." The options are "resisting Chinese ambitions" or doing nothing and loosing the current system. Confrontation means tariffs, quotas, and restrictions on Chinese imports.

A more benign view counsels patience, emphasizes incremental steps, and sees China slowly becoming a stakeholder, and hence, naturally having more authority.

In addition, China's choices lead to cheap goods for U.S. consumers, to Chinese lending which funds U.S. deficits, to a growing Chinese middle class, and to millions of Chinese lifted from abject poverty. The last two offer the promise, to some, of political reform in China.

However, forces push both countries: nationalism can run high, domestic politics demands assertiveness, and global economics trends threaten jobs and personal security.

Samuelson believes the choice is stark, that a confrontation is dangerous but that doing nothing is potentially disastrous.

What do you think? Are these forces pushing the U.S. toward a Hobson's choice between trade wars and doing nothing? How would you respond to China's growing wealth, power, and authority?

By William Vocke

For more information see:

Robert J. Samuelson, "Standing up to China: A trade war may be the lesser of two evils," The Washington Post, September 27, 2010, A15.

Photo Credits in order of Appearance

iStockphoto/Thinkstock
Blake Patterson
Eric Mueller
Bart Everson
World Economic Forum
Pete Souza
Brandi Sims
Pete Souza
Ryuu Ji
Jakob Montrasio
Brad P.
Pete Souza
Pete Souza

You may also like

JUL 17, 2025 Article

Helvetas USA Signs Model International Mobility Convention, Underscoring Practical Pathways for Rights-Based Migration

Helvetas USA CEO Christian Steiner has signed the MIMC, marking a significant step in reaffirming the organization’s commitment to a cooperative global mobility approach.

JUL 15, 2025 Podcast

Investing in Your Ethical Infrastructure, with Simon Longstaff

The Ethics Centre's Simon Longstaff discusses the power of moral inquiry, performative vs. good-faith engagement, and how ethics can help to address global challenges.

Scene from Mountainhead. CREDIT: HBO

JUL 11, 2025 Article

Ethics on Film: Discussion of "Mountainhead"

This review of HBO's "Mountainhead" discusses ethical issues around emerging tech and the power and influence of billionaires.

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation