Global Ethics Corner: Extinction

Sep 17, 2010

What should be the balance between preservation and consumption? Should there be a global ethic for protecting endangered species? If so, how should it be enforced?

This Global Ethics Corner is part of the Council's second annual SEPTEMBER SUSTAINABILITY MONTH, which kicks off a year of events and resources on sustainability. Generous funding of the Carnegie Council's 2010-2011 sustainability programming has been provided by Hewlett-Packard and by Booz & Company.

Is life sacred? We go to great lengths to protect it, as nations, in our communities, and with nature preserves.

Yet humankind is also destructive. The hunger for agricultural land has an increasing impact on our natural environment. Millions of acres of forest are bulldozed every year, mainly in tropical areas where species are most concentrated. Some of these plant species may have important medical or scientific applications.

Well known animals like gorillas are threatened with extinction, as are countless species that science hasn't even documented. We often don't know what we might be losing.

In some cases we do: conservation of the Atlantic bluefin tuna was voted down earlier this year at the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. What should be the balance between preservation and consumption?

Some extinction is natural and happens all the time. Of the species that have ever lived, 99.9 percent are now extinct. Researchers estimate, however, that the extinction rate today is 1,000 times higher than normal, mostly due to habitat destruction and other human influences.

Climate change is predicted to worsen the situation, as weather patterns shift faster than creatures can adapt.

So on what scale should we protect life? Charismatic species? Whole ecosystems? Landscapes defined by political borders?

It may sound radical to think of protecting a useful soil microbe, yet the vanishing tigers readily inspire awe. While some work to save tigers, others hunt and farm them for cultural practices.

What do you think? Should there be a global ethic for protecting species? If so how would you enforce it?

By Evan O'Neil and William Vocke

Photo Credits in order of Appearance:

Fionnaigh McKenzie
Shawn Weismiller/ U.S. Army
Chris Wong
I Bird 2
Crystal Luxmore
Steve Ryan
Leonardo F. Freitas
Katy Silberger
Stewart Butterfield
Kim F
Andrew Nicholson
Mira (On the Wall)
Pandiyan V
Quim Gil
U.S. Army
Hector Garcia
Catherine J. Hibbard/USFWS

You may also like

SEP 26, 2007 Journal

Ethics & International Affairs Volume 21.3 (Fall 2007): Feature and Online Symposium on Ecological Intervention: Ecological Intervention: Prospects and Limits [Full Text]

This groundbreaking 2007 essay seeks to extend the already controversial debate about humanitarian intervention by exploring the morality, legality, and legitimacy of ecological intervention and its ...

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation