Global Ethics Corner: Who Dies in Afghanistan: Soldiers, Civilians, or the Mission?

Jul 16, 2010

How do you choose missions to fight a war effectively, while minimizing civilian deaths and meeting the obligation to your soldiers?

When states or movements go to war, people die.


There is no bigger ethical choice than choosing to risk lives. There should be a moral purpose behind a decision to fight. In Afghanistan in 2003, with the Taliban sheltering al Qaeda and September 11th a recent memory, the moral purpose was clear. In the 2010 policy debate, for many that certainty is harder to find.

Perhaps more important, however, are the choices involved while fighting. Three competing demands must be balanced. These are amplified in a non-conventional war like Afghanistan, where a counter-insurgency strategy places them in sharp contrast.

First, young combatants are conscripted or volunteer to fight, and perhaps die. There is an ethical requirement to provide them with their best chance to survive.

Next, non-combatants rightly expect not to be targets, but separating civilians from combatants in Afghanistan is difficult. Nevertheless, there is an ethical requirement to keep them safe.

Finally, battles must be fought, and when choosing missions there is usually a tension between implementing the strategy and risking soldiers or civilians.

Balancing these three competing demands can be a vicious circle. Emphasizing mission puts winning first. But in Afghanistan, killing civilians jeopardizes the mission. Rules of engagement for soldiers that try to limit civilian deaths increase soldiers' risks.

What would you do? How do you choose missions to fight a war effectively, while minimizing civilian deaths and meeting the obligation to your soldiers?

By William Vocke


Photo Credits in order of Appearance:

Scott*
Andrya Hill/ US Army
Viewmaker
Mark O'Donald/ US Army
Rick Scavetta/ US Army
Paz Quillé, Canadian Forces Combat Camera
ussocom_ru
Craig Fiander, JTF
hugovk
Rahmudeen Nangarhari
Jennifer Cohen
Robin Mugridge

You may also like

Black Lives Matter protest near the White House in Washington, DC on June 7, 2020. CREDIT: <a href=https://www.flickr.com/photos/vpickering/49982193058/in/photolist-2j9KNDh-2j8HLyo-2j8gfRF-2j8ceNs-28YCXBs-3PNWg-2j8ePpz-236VNse-7hjLfs-2j7gCdJ-p2QT8D-2j7pFRB-RCwDLE-nus8id-2j9Az2D-27tUqSG-pGdhqe-wnLiC2-HXvuL3-pGf7X5-2j7pEtg-212G4s3-21AUXJs-2s8J8-2ja5YFy-2sa57-2sa55-cDaREG-bHHavT-2sa53-2jajtQJ-4rPzz-2ia58JD-2j7tH61-bnLsYN-2j9NtRp-2j7tHWK-29ZBoXo-292fBVk-RZKY7Q-p294TD-8eK6DN-DseXHT-Rkwjok-4X5y1A-2a1hihY-SkGTp1-Szz6i6-69vein-2j7tGCs/>Victoria Pickering (CC)</a>.

JUN 10, 2020 Article

The Breonna Taylor/George Floyd Narrative? Impacts on U.S. Foreign Policy and International Standing

In this blog post, U.S. Global Engagement Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev asks: With the COVID-19 pandemic already calling America's leadership role into question, how ...

Belfast, Northern Ireland, March 24, 2020. CREDIT: <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Belfast_COVID19_Traffic_Management_Sign.jpg">Gerry Lynch (CC)</a>

APR 17, 2020 Podcast

Fractured Globalization & Dissolving Ethics, with Nikolas Gvosdev

If global interconnections begin to fray in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, what happens to the ethical underpinnings of international relations? Senior Fellow Nikolas ...

Health checkpoints at an airport in Milan, Italy on February 7, 2020. CREDIT: <a href= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Emergenza_coronavirus_(49501382461).jpg> Protezione Civile (CC)</a>.

MAR 14, 2020 Article

Peace By Poison: How the Coronavirus Could Fix Globalization Problems

How is the COVID-19 pandemic stress-testing the international system? Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev writes that the virus is accelerating a series of disintegrative processes, which ...