Global Ethics Corner: Development Aid

Jun 4, 2010

Should the U.S. be helping developing countries when it has its own dramatic domestic problems?

How should the U.S. help developing countries, when it too faces dramatic domestic problems?

The relatively small amount of aid sometimes surprises Americans.

President Obama's increased the 2010 budget for non-military aid to developing countries is nearly $60 billion, but most is for conflict areas like Afghanistan and Iraq. Only about $15 billion is to combat global hunger, poverty, health, and humanitarian issues.

This only meets about 1/5th of the UN goal of .7 percent of US Gross National Income. Nevertheless, $60 billion or $15 billion is big money to most Americans.

The premise of an official ongoing review of American development policy is that funding should "reinforce the universal values we aim to advance."

Tellingly, however, the draft frames the case for foreign aid in terms of national security and economic growth, attempting to reenergize US development policy by calling it a "strategic imperative."

There are then three issues.

  • First, does the U.S. have obligation or motivation to provide any aid?
  • Second, if so where should it be targeted?
  • Finally, how much should be budgeted.

One moral argument is that the poorest of the poor require assistance without strings. A counter is that U.S. dollars should only serve U.S. national interests. A middle ground recognizes that mutual benefit occurs when the United States views others as peers in pursuit of progress, instead of simply as instruments in pursuit of security or trade goals.

What do you think? What is the American obligation? To whom? How much?

By Evan O'Neil & William Vocke


For more information see:

Council on Foreign Relations, "The Debate over Foreign Aid," May 6, 2010

Josh Rogin, "White House Proposed Taking Development Role Away from State," Foriegn Policy, May 3, 2010

Evan O'Neil, "Pragmatic Overdose: Ethics and Creativity Are Stifled in the new U.S. Development Policy", Carnegie Council for Ethics and International Affairs, June 2010.

You may also like

APR 7, 2022 Podcast

The Doorstep: Pakistan & the Populist World Order, with Atlantic Council's Uzair Younus

A leader asking his second in command to keep him in power. A parliament dissolved. A Supreme Court deciding the fate of a nation. Echoes ...

COVID-19 vaccination line in Nagpur, India, May 2021. CREDIT: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:COVID-19_vaccination_queue_01052021.jpg">Ganesh Dhamodkar/Wikimedia</a> <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en">(CC)</a>

MAY 20, 2021 Article

Vaccine Diplomacy versus Vaccine Nationalism: Synthesis or Dissonance?

In response to Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev's blog post on "vaccine diplomacy vs. vaccine nationalism" Samuel Owusu-Antwi, Ph.D. candidate at the University of Ghana, ...

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken &  Vice President Joe Biden in Honolulu, July 2016. CREDIT: <a href="https://dod.defense.gov/OIR/gallery/igphoto/2001574265/">Staff Sgt. Chris Hubenthal/U.S.Department of Defense</a>/<a href="https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/">Public Domain</a>

NOV 23, 2020 Article

Competing Ethics in the Biden Administration?

In this blog post responding to Thomas Wright's recent article in "The Atlantic," Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev outlines the three different "camps" vying for influence ...