Global Ethics Corner: The Irony of Nuclear Weapons?

Apr 16, 2010

This short video on ethics asks: Are nuclear weapons a necessary evil? Is it better to live in a world with nuclear deterrence or one that is free of nuclear threats? What do you think?

The new START agreement between the U.S. and Russia reduces nuclear weapons to 1550 on each side, which still remains enough to destroy the world many times over.The Nuclear Security Summit is an attempt to implement controls on radioactive material from industrial, medical, or energy waste. This fissile material is much more accessible than the weapons of the nine-plus nuclear states.Terrorist acquisition of one tactical nuclear weapon, small enough to fit in a suitcase, is frightening. Terrorist possession of fissile material, wrapped around conventional explosives to make a dirty bomb, is terrifying.The curse of nuclear weapons and fissile material is the vast destruction and death they threaten.The ironic blessing, at least of weapons, is deterrence—armed peace. Deterrence in the Cold War meant living on the brink of Armageddon, but also avoided warfare with the Soviet Union. Similarly, India and Pakistan acquired nuclear weapons and have had fewer border clashes, while Israel's assumed nuclear weapons are an existential guarantee. Some countries, like North Korea and Iran, seek them.Intellectually, the genie is out of the bottle. The processes for building a weapon are known and replicable. The fissile waste is with us for centuries. At best, we can control the number of weapons, the spread of the process, and access to the material.

What is our nuclear future: resignedly living within a world of deterrence, endlessly attempting to restrict weapons and materials, or idealistically creating a world free of nuclear threats? What do you think?

By William Vocke

You may also like

NOV 2, 2021 Video

Carnegie New Leaders Podcast: International Relations in the Context of Plato, with Ilya Kursenko

Samantha Jordan, president of Carnegie New Leaders, speaks with Ilya Kursenko, a member of the Carnegie New Leaders and a Master's student at Saint Petersburg ...

L to R: Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro, Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi. CREDIT: <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Plen%C3%A1rio_do_Senado_(24998818073).jpg">Beto Barata/Agência Senado</a> <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en">(CC)</a>, <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/eu2017ee/36707749773">Annika Haas </a> <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en">(CC)</a> and <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Prime_Minister,_Shri_Narendra_Modi_addressing_at_the_webinar_for_effective_implementation_of_Union_Budget_in_Defence_Sector_(cropped)(2).jpg">Prime Minister's Office, Government of India </a> <a href="https://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/Gazette_Notification_OGDL.pdf">(GODL-India)</a>.

JUN 9, 2021 Podcast

Illiberal Democracy on the Rise: Examining Brazil, Hungary, & India

The post-World War II liberal order faces unprecedented upheaval as countries and their leaders retreat from globalism, embrace nationalism, and attack democratic norms. Whether it’...

JUN 7, 2019 Journal

Ethics & International Affairs Volume 33.2 (Summer 2019)

This issue features a roundtable on artificial intelligence and the future of global affairs. It also contains essays about the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption; ...