The Missing Ingredient: Applied Ethics

Jul 24, 2009

Policies are often debated along three dimensions: effectiveness, efficiency, and expediency. In place of a fourth dimension—applied ethics—we usually find sensationalism and polarization. Can public discourse rise above shouting?

Why do public decisions become so divisive?

Many people are discouraged by how governments make decisions, disgusted with the intentional polarization of opinion, or dismissive and cynical of soaring ideals.

In government, think-tank, and media circles, public decisions are debated along three dimensions, while a fourth atrophies.

The first dimension is effectiveness; what policy best meets the goals, provides the best outcome?

The next is efficiency; what is the cost, the economics of the policy?

The third is expediency; what are the politics, what can we get through the political process?

The last and often missing ingredient is applied ethics; what is right and wrong, what should we do?

In its place we usually find sensationalism and polarization. For many, ethics simply means asserting one's own position. Real ethical discourse accepts a plurality of legitimate views without succumbing to relativism. It credits opponents with genuine concerns.

The debate and the decisions should be about policies that are effective, efficient, expedient, and also ethical.

What do you think? Can divergent but equally legitimate opinions be acknowledged? Can public discourse rise above shouting? Or is polarity and sensationalism simply an unfortunate result of modernity?

By William Vocke

To post a comment, go to the Global Ethics Corner slideshow.

You may also like

FEB 9, 2022 Podcast

Where is the Public Square for the Digital Information Age? with Stelios Vassilakis

In this episode of the "Artificial Intelligence & Equality Initiative" podcast, Senior Fellow Anja Kaspersen and Carnegie Council President Joel Rosenthal sit down with the Stavros ...

COVID-19 vaccination line in Nagpur, India, May 2021. CREDIT: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:COVID-19_vaccination_queue_01052021.jpg">Ganesh Dhamodkar/Wikimedia</a> <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en">(CC)</a>

MAY 20, 2021 Article

Vaccine Diplomacy versus Vaccine Nationalism: Synthesis or Dissonance?

In response to Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev's blog post on "vaccine diplomacy vs. vaccine nationalism" Samuel Owusu-Antwi, Ph.D. candidate at the University of Ghana, ...

Washington, DC, June 3, 2020. CREDIT: <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/mobili/49970479326/">Mobilus in Mobili</a> <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/">(CC)</a>.

JUN 8, 2020 Article

Vox Populi: After the Event

Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev follows up on his recent "Vox Populi" webinar. The virtual event with Eurasia Group Foundation's Mark Hannah and The Chicago Council ...