The Missing Ingredient: Applied Ethics

Jul 24, 2009

Policies are often debated along three dimensions: effectiveness, efficiency, and expediency. In place of a fourth dimension—applied ethics—we usually find sensationalism and polarization. Can public discourse rise above shouting?

Why do public decisions become so divisive?

Many people are discouraged by how governments make decisions, disgusted with the intentional polarization of opinion, or dismissive and cynical of soaring ideals.

In government, think-tank, and media circles, public decisions are debated along three dimensions, while a fourth atrophies.

The first dimension is effectiveness; what policy best meets the goals, provides the best outcome?

The next is efficiency; what is the cost, the economics of the policy?

The third is expediency; what are the politics, what can we get through the political process?

The last and often missing ingredient is applied ethics; what is right and wrong, what should we do?

In its place we usually find sensationalism and polarization. For many, ethics simply means asserting one's own position. Real ethical discourse accepts a plurality of legitimate views without succumbing to relativism. It credits opponents with genuine concerns.

The debate and the decisions should be about policies that are effective, efficient, expedient, and also ethical.

What do you think? Can divergent but equally legitimate opinions be acknowledged? Can public discourse rise above shouting? Or is polarity and sensationalism simply an unfortunate result of modernity?

By William Vocke

To post a comment, go to the Global Ethics Corner slideshow.

You may also like

Joel Rosenthal at the UN

MAR 2, 2023 Article

Gandhian Trusteeship: Empathy, Mutuality, and a New Realism

On February 23, 2023, Carnegie Council President Joel Rosenthal spoke on empathy, mutuality, realism, and in the influence of Mahatma Gandhi at an event organized by Permanent ...

JAN 4, 2022 Journal

Ethics & International Affairs Volume 35.4 (Winter 2021)

The issue features a book symposium organized by Michael Blake on Anna Stilz's "Territorial Sovereignty," with contributions from Adom Getachew; Christopher Heath Wellman; and Michael ...

APR 27, 2021 Podcast

Global Ethics Review: The Model International Mobility Convention 2.0, with Michael Doyle

How can we make migration more ethical? Columbia University's Professor Michael Doyle, also a senior fellow at Carnegie Council, discusses the Model International Mobility Convention (...

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation