Banning headscarves may violate an individual's right of religious expression and choice. Allowing headscarves may violate a state's commitment to secularism. How do we marry public goods and religious imperatives?
Think of headscarves.
Banning headscarves may violate my right of religious expression and choice. Who cares what I wear?
Allowing headscarves may violate a state's commitment to secularism. Why must I be accosted in public spaces like universities with the personal beliefs of others?
Requiring headscarves may be religious oppression of women, a human rights violation, but by not requiring them do I violate God's higher laws?
According to Ahmet Kuru, "There is a sharp policy distinction between the US, which allows students' religious symbols; France, which bans these symbols in public schools; ...Turkey, which prohibits them in all public and private educational institutions," and Iran, which requires them.
In America we talk about separation of church and state, a passive form of secularism. In France as well as Turkey, the phrase is laïcité, a more assertive secularism.
The three options for state policies may each violate a human right or religious mandate: headscarves for everyone, for no-one, or by personal choice.
How secular can and should the public sphere be? Who decides? How do we marry public goods and religious imperatives?
To post a comment, go to the Global Ethics Corner slideshow.
