Global Ethics Corner: Choosing between Markets, Regulation, and Rewards

Jan 16, 2009

How can we resolve the financial melt-down and prevent another? Solutions focus on free markets, regulation, or rewards. Perhaps we should balance all three? How?

How can we resolve the financial melt-down and prevent another? Solutions focus on free markets, regulation, or rewards.

Markets are supposed to self-regulate through negative feedback, yet deregulated markets can swell into overvalued bubbles.

Regulation can prevent bubbles, but perhaps at the expense of dynamism, creativity and choice. Unfortunately, regulation also usually favors one player, sometimes correcting abuses while simultaneously triggering future time-bombs.

Rewards can work as well as rules. Harvard's John Ruggie suggests that a more ethical capitalism might emerge, not by instilling ethics in people, but by creating incentives based on ethical frameworks. Individual ethics alone can't balance an incentive structure that encourages excess and irresponsible risk-taking.

What do you think?

Should we let markets work with minimum intervention because the dangers of regulation, while different, are just as great?

Should we regulate more strictly, knowing we are favoring some and creating future problems?

Should we create reward structures that pay people for good behavior? Is this even possible in a highly materialistic and commercial society?

Perhaps we should balance all three? But how?

By William Vocke

To post a comment, go to the Global Ethics Corner slideshow.

You may also like

MAY 6, 2022 Podcast

For Companies, Could China Be the Next Russia? with Perth Tolle

After Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the global financial backlash was swift and unprecedented: Dozens of financial institutions cut off their exposure to the Russian market ...

President Macron at the World Economic Forum's Davos Agenda, January 2021. <br>CREDIT: <a href="">World Economic Forum/Pascal Bitz</a> <a href="">(CC)</a>

MAR 30, 2021 Article

ESG Offers Capacity, Capital, and Consensus for Global Challenges

In this article, Carnegie New Leader Ravipal Bains outlines an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) led reorientation of the global financial system. The core idea ...

Joel Rosenthal at the UN

MAR 2, 2023 Article

Gandhian Trusteeship: Empathy, Mutuality, and a New Realism

On February 23, 2023, Carnegie Council President Joel Rosenthal spoke on empathy, mutuality, realism, and in the influence of Mahatma Gandhi at an event organized by Permanent ...

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation