Global Ethics Corner: Fear and the Financial Implosion

Dec 5, 2008

Will our responses to the financial crisis be constructive, or will panic cloud our judgments?

Natan Sharansky asks, Can you "go to the town square and express your views, whatever they are, and not be punished, not be put in prison? If so, it is a free society. If not, it is a fear society."

Fear is a universal trait across time, culture, and peoples. To be human is to feel threatened. Other hard wired instincts include moral sentiments like empathy and fairness.

From a public policy perspective fear can easily slide into terror, when the threat is an Ebola virus run wild, a terrorist cell with nuclear materials, or a financial system unhinged.

These are the ultimate tests of leadership. One reason for a republic and its separation of powers is the need to walk a thin line, avoiding the responses of either mob rule or demagogic leaders.

FDR voiced this simple insight, "The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself." When fear grows, it can suck us down into a vortex. Twain said, "History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes." The financial fears of 1932 have resonance today.

Will our responses be constructive, or will panic cloud our judgments? How do you face fear in a time of crisis?

By Joel Rosenthal

To post a comment, go to the Global Ethics Corner slideshow.

You may also like

MAY 13, 2025 Video

Advancing Global Health in a Moment of Fracturing Partnerships

In this event from our Ethics Empowered: Leadership in Practice series, practitioners examined the impact of today's geopolitical environment on the future of public health.

APR 29, 2025 Podcast

Interrogating Our “Norms” with Professor Tanisha Fazal

University of Minnesota's Professor Tanisha Fazal joins the "Values & Interests" podcast to discuss shifting geopolitical norms in a moment of global transition.

Vote to America Great Again billboard. CREDIT: Quinn Dombrowski (CC).

APR 23, 2025 Article

Erase & Rewind: The Politics of Nostalgia & its Ethical Implications

Populist leaders like Donald Trump & Vladimir Putin frequently employ nostalgic rhetoric for political gain. Tinatin Japaridze analyzes the impact & ethical downsides of this strategy.

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation