Ethics & International Affairs Volume 17.1 (Spring 2003): Debate: Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing: If Not Combatants Certainly Not Civilians [Abstract]

Mar 2, 2003

Stein and I see targeted killing in fundamentally different ways. Stein sees the Palestinian terrorists as civilian noncombatants who are not engaged in war or even armed conflict with Israel. As such, there is no legal or moral right to target them. I see targeted killing as an appropriate response to an intolerable threat. Israel has the right and obligation to defend itself against armed Palestinians who seek to kill as many innocent Israeli civilians as possible. So long as the Palestinian Authority is incapable or unwilling to halt terrorist attacks, most interpretations of international law, Israeli law, and just war tradition support Israel’s efforts to stop these murderous attacks before they can be carried out.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

You may also like

JUL 21, 2026 Podcast

The Myth of AI Inevitability

Artificial intelligence doesn't happen to us. Virginia Dignum on the choices, power, and human agency shaping the future of AI.

Carnegie Ethics Fellows tour the Autonomous Systems Lab at Stanford University CREDIT: Kathleen Egan.

JUL 20, 2026 Article

Carnegie Ethics Fellows Visit San Francisco for Module on Ethics and Emerging Technology

The first-ever offsite Carnegie Ethics Fellow module in the Silicon Valley featured meetings with researchers, practitioners, ethicists, venture capitalists, and technologists.

JUN 29, 2026 Podcast

Soft Power in an Era of Nationalism

From ancient Rome to modern geopolitics, Hendrik W. Ohnesorge explores why soft power remains essential in an increasingly transactional age.

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation