Ethics & International Affairs Volume 17.1 (Spring 2003): Debate: Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing: If Not Combatants Certainly Not Civilians [Abstract]

Mar 2, 2003

Stein and I see targeted killing in fundamentally different ways. Stein sees the Palestinian terrorists as civilian noncombatants who are not engaged in war or even armed conflict with Israel. As such, there is no legal or moral right to target them. I see targeted killing as an appropriate response to an intolerable threat. Israel has the right and obligation to defend itself against armed Palestinians who seek to kill as many innocent Israeli civilians as possible. So long as the Palestinian Authority is incapable or unwilling to halt terrorist attacks, most interpretations of international law, Israeli law, and just war tradition support Israel’s efforts to stop these murderous attacks before they can be carried out.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

You may also like

AUG 20, 2026 Article

The Status of Migration in 2025 and Beyond: Trans-Atlantic Perspectives

In November 2025, Carnegie Council’s Model International Mobility Convention initiative and Helvetas hosted a discussion on the state of migration and practical areas for cooperation.

AUG 11, 2026 Podcast

Preparing Ethical Leaders in a Fragmented World

Noah Bopp, founder of The School for Ethics and Global Leadership, discusses educating the next generation of leaders amid polarization and institutional decline.

JUL 21, 2026 Podcast

The Myth of AI Inevitability

Artificial intelligence doesn't happen to us. Virginia Dignum on the choices, power, and human agency shaping the future of AI.

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation