Five Perspectives on Intervention in Syria

Sep 6, 2013

Should the United States and/or the international community intervene in Syria? And if so, how? What are the moral, legal, and strategic issues at stake? What are the possible future scenarios for this war-torn country?

Here are five differing viewpoints on Syria, listed in alphabetical order by author. What do you think? What's the right thing to do? Post a comment here, or on individual articles.

On Law, Policy, and (Not) Bombing Syria Ian Hurd, Northwestern University, Member of Ethics & International Affairs Editorial Board (Council's Journal)The question of whether the U.S. should use its military against Assad is separate from the questions of legal interpretation. The legal question does not address the likely consequences of the use of force.

Seven Scenarios for the Future of SyriaSeth Kaplan, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Johns Hopkins University"Now that the country has imploded, there is no easy way out." Seth Kaplan outlines possible futures for Syria, followed by a list of recommended international options.

Syria: The Case for Punitive InterventionAnthony F. Lang, Jr., St Andrews University, Scotland, Member of Ethics & International Affairs Editorial Board (Council's Journal) "If framed in terms of punishment for a wrong committed, and if undertaken in a way that respects the rule of law at the global level, a military strike against the Assad regime makes moral, legal and even strategic sense."Syria: "To Jaw-Jaw Is Always Better than to War-War"David C. Speedie, Carnegie CouncilThe mantra of those who are pro-intervention in Syria is that while there are no good options, in the face of tens of thousands of deaths, something must be done. But according to David Speedie, while understandable, this is wrong for a number of reasons, both moral and pragmatic.Finding our National Moral Compass on SyriaJohn Tessitore, Carnegie CouncilThe U.S. received aid from other nations during its own Revolutionary War, and so despite all, "as America debates the pros and cons of U.S. assistance to the people of Syria who are fighting against their own tyrant, we would do well to remember what we owe to the willingness of others to do what was morally right, however inconvenient."

You may also like

FEB 10, 2021 News

Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs Announces 2021 Impact Initiatives

Carnegie Council is pleased to announce its 2021 Impact Initiatives. These initiatives identify pressing ethical issues, convene leading experts, and produce agenda-setting resources to educate and ...

Election Day 2020. Des Moines, Iowa. CREDIT: <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/tabor-roeder/50564518207/">Phil Roeder</a> <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">(CC)</a>

DEC 15, 2020 News

The Public Supports a Foreign Policy Approach that Prioritizes Building Collaborative Partnerships with Other Democratic States

This project on U.S. Global Engagement was launched in 2018. Following the two previous reports, "The Public Responds" includes findings from two surveys taken in 2020 ...

JUL 9, 2020 News

Just Out: "Ethics & International Affairs" Summer 2020 Issue

The highlight of the Summer 2020 issue of "Ethics & International Affairs" is a roundtable organized by Daniel R. Brunstetter on limited strikes and the associated ethical, ...