Superpower Ethics: The Rules of the Game [Abstract]

From our Archives: 100 for 100
Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 1 (1987)

Black and White Chess Pieces. Shutterstock: http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-145891229/stock-photo--black-and-white-chess-pieces.html?src=c9KwfZ86j2bD1r3xlg8zcw-1-7 Black and White Chess Pieces via Shutterstock

To mark our Centennial, this article is free online until December 31, 2014.

International systems have historically come in two forms: those based on the balance of power and those of a revolutionary nature, including systems organized around bipolar competition. Hoffmann finds the world order of 1987 to contain both these systems and judges it both ambiguous and original. While the tension of these extremes can make the world appear "anarchical," there are certain agreed upon rules by which the superpowers interact. These rules ultimately preserve order by embracing competition between the United States and the Soviet Union; superpower confrontation is prevented by each nation holding to their own ideals and sovereignty while embracing nuclear deterrence. Having revealed the rules of the superpower game, Hoffmann then subjects them to ethical judgment. Despite the historic duration of peace between superpowers that seems to have been sustained by these rules, Hoffmann finds them both ethically flawed and ultimately unstable. Turning to a brief consideration of United States foreign policy, he points to particular moral difficulties in U.S. stances and urges the development of superpower rules that are effective and ethical.

To read the full text of this article, click here.

Read More: Ethics, Europe, Intervention, Security, Ethics, International Relations, Preventive War, U.S. Foreign Policy, Europe, North America, Russia, United States

blog comments powered by Disqus
Search Our Site

People  |  Advanced Search

In this Issue of the Journal
Join our Mailing Lists
Online Magazine

Online Magazine

Social Network

Social Network

The Journal

The Journal

postprandial-ft