Global Ethics Corner: NATO and Turkey: Should Human Rights Be Sacrificed for a Missile Defense System?

Jan 20, 2012

As NATO's missile defense system goes live in Turkey, questions have been raised about the nation's human rights record. Should NATO condemn Turkey's recent crackdowns on free speech and the media? Or does the country's geostrategic importance trump these concerns?

NATO's controversial missile defense system only recently went live in Turkey. But already, the early warning radar station is sounding alarms.

NATO's missile defense radar is designed to intercept medium-range missiles at high altitudes. It was initially hailed as a major geostrategic feat for U.S.-Turkey relations. Many predicted that the deal would protect Europe from a foreign missile attack and strengthen ties between Turkey and the West.

In recent days, however, Turkey's growing ties to NATO have caused friction.

Human rights defenders say NATO's embrace of Turkey could not come at a worse time. For decades, Turkey has been heralded as an emblem of Muslim democracy. The only Muslim-majority member of NATO, Turkey has long been praised as a powerful example of a modern secular government.

But this key U.S. ally has recently witnessed a stunning democratic setback. Human rights advocates say the government is cracking down on dissent and eliminating free speech. According to critics, freedom of the press is being curtailed through a nasty mix of state-sponsored intimidation, arrests, censorship, and fines.

Some are calling on NATO to take a more vocal role in condemning Turkey's anti-democratic trajectory. In a recent GOP debate, former U.S. presidential hopeful Rick Perry even went so far as to suggest that Turkey be expelled from NATO.

As the geostrategic partnership between Turkey and NATO strengthens, how important is Turkey's human rights record? Should NATO take a more vocal stance against signs of authoritarian retrenchment? Or, does Turkey's geostrategic importance outweigh its domestic political setbacks?

By Marlene Spoerri

For more information see

Dan Bilefsky and Sebnem Arsu, "Charges Against Journalists Dim the Democratic Glow in Turkey," The New York Times, January 4, 2012

Steven A. Cook and Bernard Gwertzman, "Turkey's Rising Mideast Role," Council on Foreign Relations, October 26, 2011

Keith Johnson, "Talking Turkey: Rick Perry’s Latest ‘Oops’ Moment?," The Wall Street Journal, January 17, 2012

"Part of NATO missile defense system goes live in Turkey," CNN, January 16, 2012

Photo Credits in order of Appearance:
Lt. j.g. Nelson H. Balido/U.S. Navy
U.S. Missile Defense Agency
Pete Souza/White House
Master Sgt. Jerry Morrison/U.S. Air Force/Department of Defense
White Cat OR Hsing Wei
Andrea Giudiceandrea OR Randam
Alec Vuijlsteke
Gage Skidmore
Staff Sgt. Eric Wilson/Texas Military Forces

You may also like

APR 9, 2024 Video

Algorithms of War: The Use of AI in Armed Conflict

From Gaza to Ukraine, the military applications of AI are fundamentally reshaping the ethics of war. How should policymakers navigate AI’s inherent trade-offs?

Left to Right: Ramu Damodaran, Dima Al-Khatib, Archie Young, Fernando Marani. March 27, 2024.

MAR 28, 2024 Video

Unlocking Cooperation: The Global South and Global North

In the inaugural panel of the "Unlocking Cooperation" series, Ramu Damodaran leads a discussion on forging a path forward for Global South/North collaboration.

Uruguay signs the Artemis Accords, February 15, 2024, Washington, DC. CREDIT: NASA HQ Photo.

MAR 6, 2024 Article

Empowering the Artemis Accords Coalition for Peace and Stability

As missions ramp up, Zhanna Malekos Smith writes that the U.S. should lead an effort with the Artemis Accords for space sustainability and security.

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation