Logo

Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 20.4 (Winter 2006)

November 28, 2006

Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 20.4

With the first segment of the trial of Saddam Hussein almost complete and the second just beginning, there is an opportunity for reflection on questions about how he and other responsible officials of his regime should have been or should be tried. In broad terms, has the trial been fair to the defendants, and will it provide justice for the Iraqi people? In the Winter 2006 issue of Ethics & International Affairs, Kingsley Chiedu Moghalu, former legal advisor to the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and Miranda Sissons, Head of the Iraq Program at the International Center for Transitional Justice, discuss the fairness and efficacy of the Dujail trial and suggest improvements for the future.

This issue also features Allen Buchanan and Robert O. Keohane on a public standard for the legitimacy of global governance institutions. David Mellows clarifies when wars can be called proportional. Gerhard Øverland argues that soldiers may be justified in killing innocent conscripts only when the latter are part of an aggressive army. And Martin Flaherty contends that allowing U.S. courts to rely on foreign law will improve our democracy.

RECENT BOOKS ON ETHICS AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

A New World Order, Anne-Marie Slaughter
REVIEWED BY ANTONIO FRANCESCHET

Deliberative Environmental Politics: Democracy and Ecological Rationality, Walter F. Baber and Robert V. Bartlett
REVIEWED BY IAN WARD

The Killing Trap: Genocide in the Twentieth Century, Manus Midlarsky
REVIEWED BY MAUREEN S. HIEBERT

Hannah Arendt and International Relations: Reading Across the Lines, Anthony F. Lang, Jr. and John Williams, EDS.
REVIEWED BY PATCHEN MARKELL

The J Curve: A New Way to Understand Why Nations Rise and Fall, Ian Bremmer
REVIEWED BY DEVIN STEWART

Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 20.4 (Winter 2006)

Articles

Symposium: The Trial of Saddam Hussein