The UN Charter and the Neoconservative Challenge

Dec 13, 2005

For many, the 2003 invasion of Iraq exemplifies the emergence of powerful new justifications for the international use of force—in particular, the aims of prevention and democracy promotion. These are hallmarks of the neoconservative challenge to traditional norms on the use of force given in the UN Charter. In this background paper—the first of our new Ethics in a Violent World initiative—Tom Farer provides a broad overview of the neoconservative project as well as sharp criticisms of its aims. He also offers arguments and suggestions for shoring up the traditional norms provided in the UN Charter in the face of new global threats.

You may also like

Left to Right: Peter Hoffman, Asha Castleberry-Hernandez, Scott Silverstone. CREDIT: Kathleen Egan.

DEC 11, 2025 Video

Re-examining our Capacity for Just Peace

Watch this discussion featuring distinguished experts reflecting on the state of war in 2025 and the obstacles to achieving just peace.

DEC 10, 2025 Feature

Empowering Ethics in 2025

Explore Carnegie Council’s 2025 Year in Review resource which highlights podcasts, events, and more covering some of this year’s key ethical issues.

DEC 9, 2025 Article

A Conversation with Carnegie Ethics Fellow Nadav Avihay

This interview series profiles members of the CEF cohort. This talk features Nadav Avihay, a sustainability associate at SL Green.

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation