Striking First: Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict
Michael W. Doyle, Harold H. Koh
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
JW Player goes here
Having trouble with audio or video playback? Click here
Is the Bush Doctrine of aggressive preventive action a justified and legal recourse against threats posed by terrorists and rogue states? Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an attack is in progress?
Related Resources:
- Striking First: Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict (Audio)
- Striking First: Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict (Transcript)
Read More: Terrorism, Warfare, Armed Conflict, Just War Tradition, Preventive War, U.S. Foreign Policy, War on Terror
blog comments powered by Disqus