Articles
Introduction: Human Rights in Times of Conflict: Humanitarian Intervention
01/20/01
The most immediate and visible effect of humanitarian intervention is on the actual human rights abuses that it is supposed to stem. Does the intervention stop these abuses? Does it have any impact at all? Does it create new, unintended human rights abuses?
Was Intervention in Kosovo Just? A Kosovar Perspective
01/06/01
Visoka observes that "despite claims by Serbian politicians and diplomats that this was an internal Yugoslav affair, the international community decided that the situation needed their attention. Everyone in Kosovo certainly feels that the NATO intervention was the right thing to do."
Author(s):
Leonora Visoka
Kosovo’s Little-Known Victims: The Fate of the Roma Following the Entry of NATO Troops
01/06/01
Following the return of the ethnic Albanians to Kosovo in June 1999 and the entry of NATO (KFOR) troops into the province, Albanians conducted a sustained and brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing against Kosovo’s Roma.
Author(s):
Claude Cahn
The Fallacy of Neutral Humanitarianism in Bosnia
01/06/01
Workers Aid for Bosnia was criticized by other humanitarian organizations for its political support for a united, multi-ethnic Bosnia. But the more we went into Bosnia, writes Myers, the more critical we became of most of our critics and, above all, of the United Nations and NATO.
Author(s):
Robert Myers
A Credibility Problem in Kosovo: The Undermining of Local Human Rights Culture
01/06/01
The international community’s failure to respond earlier to human rights violations, its refusal to explain its actions in terms of human rights motivations, and its intervention out of step with human rights principles undermined the legitimacy of human rights in Kosovo.
Author(s):
Julie A. Mertus
A Challenge for Serbian Civil Society: The Death and Rebirth of the Human Rights Movement
01/06/01
Serbian activists realized during the NATO bombing that they were victims of the policies of their own government; but they also felt like victims of the international community's use of military means to promote the human rights standards they had been advocating peacefully for years.
Author(s):
Jelena Subotic
The Successes and Failures of UN Intervention in East Timor
01/06/01
Magno observes: "Every time you talk about an international tribunal with someone who works for the U.N. in East Timor they say, 'Well, you know, it takes a lot of money, it takes a lot of time . . . .' The people of East Timor say they want justice, [but] the U.N. is reluctant to undertake the task."
Author(s):
Ajiza Magno
Post-Conflict Institutions That Promote Human Rights: The Human Rights Chamber of Bosnia-Herzegovina
01/06/01
Recent military humanitarian intervention has been based on the need to protect human rights, and a successful military campaign under this banner must assure the protection of these rights. Once hostilities end, however, there are huge obstacles to the success of this task.
Author(s):
James Newton
Inconsistency and the Tragedy of Africa's Neglect
01/06/01
Humanitarian intervention is based on the alleviation of human rights violations, but ecent actions in Sierra Leone and Kosovo suggest that the practice has less to do with stopping abuses than with furthering the interests of the intervening powers and their advocates.
Author(s):
Pierre Antoine Louis
The Choices for the International Human Rights Movement
01/06/01
Roth remarks that, for the pacifist, "the debate over humanitarian intervention is easy. War is the ultimate evil, to be opposed in any circumstance. For a human rights activist, the issue is more complex." When might military force be appropriate to stop human rights abuse?
Author(s):
Kenneth Roth
eNewsletter Signup
Most Emailed Pages