The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy [Abstract]
Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 21.2 (Summer 2007)
June 1, 2007
| Luis Cabrera |
Despite some limited moves toward openness and accountability, suprastate policy formation in such bodies as the World Trade Organization remains fundamentally exclusive of individuals within states. This article critiques the "don't kill the goose" arguments commonly offered in defense of such exclusions. It highlights similarities between those arguments and past arguments for elitist forms of democracy, where strict limitations are advocated on the participation of non-elites in the name of allowing leaders to act most effectively in the broad public interest. Advocated here is movement toward a strongly empowered WTO parliamentary body that would be guided in practice by a principle of democratic symmetry, attempting to match input to the increasing impacts of WTO governance. A parliament with co-decision powers broadly similar to those of the European Parliament is offered as a long-term institutional ideal.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
Read More: Globalization, World Economy, Democracy, European Union, Global Governance
EIA celebrates 25 years, 1987-2011
blog comments powered by Disqus