Uganda's Civil War and the Politics of ICC Intervention [Full Text]
Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 21.2 (Summer 2007)
June 1, 2007
As to the first, the article argues that the Ugandan government referred the conflict to the ICC in order to obtain international support for its militarization and to entrench, not resolve, the war; the ICC, in accepting the referral and only prosecuting the LRA, has in effect chosen to pursue a politically pragmatic case even though doing so contravened the interests of peace, justice, and the rule of law. As to the second, the article reveals the harmful effects that ICC intervention can have upon the capacity for autonomous political organization and action among civilian victims of violence, specifically how it leads to de-politicization by promoting a political dependency mediated by international law. The article draws from this analysis disturbing implications about ICC interventions generally, and concludes by asking whether ICC practice may be reformed so as to avoid these negative consequences.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
Read More: Transitional Justice, Reconciliation, Security, Intervention, Armed Conflict, International Criminal Court , Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, Uganda

EIA celebrates 25 years, 1987-2011


blog comments powered by Disqus