Carnegie Council

Shopping Cart

People Topics

Text Size: A A

Print this Page Email this Page Bookmark and Share

Humanitarian Imperialism: Response to "Ending Tyranny in Iraq" [Full Text]

Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 19.2 (Summer 2005)

Terry Nardin

July 13, 2005

Terry Nardin
Terry Nardin
Fernando Tesón offers two “humanitarian rationales” for the war in Iraq. The first, which he calls the “narrow” rationale, is that the war was fought to overthrow a tyrant. The second, “grand,” rationale is that it was fought as part of a strategy for defending the United States by establishing democratic regimes in the Middle East and throughout the world—peacefully, if possible, but by force if necessary. Both rationales strain the traditional understanding of humanitarian intervention.

Download PDF File (PDF, 472.98 K)

Related Resources:

Read More: Empire, Intervention, Iraq War, Human Rights, Security, Warfare, Just War, Humanitarian Intervention, Iraq War, National Security, United States, Iraq


blog comments powered by Disqus

About the Journal

The Carnegie Council's flagship publication, Ethics & International Affairs is an interdisciplinary resource for scholars, students, and policy analysts concerned with the moral dimensions of global issues. The journal covers global justice, civil society, democratization, international law, intervention, sanctions, and related topics.

Search the Journal

Sign up for the EIA Journal Newsletter

SUBSCRIPTIONS
To subscribe to Ethics & International Affairs, or to purchase individual issues and articles, please contact Cambridge University Press.

CALL FOR PAPERS
We are currently accepting submissions for upcoming issues of the journal. For more information, click here.

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
For submission guidelines, click here.

RESPONSES
The Editors welcome responses to Features and Essays published in Ethics & International Affairs. To be considered for publication, responses should be no longer than one thousand words, including endnotes (which should be kept to a minimum). Responses are not peer-reviewed, and are published at the Editors' discretion. All responses are subject to editing for length and style. In the event of any questions or substantive editing, the response will be returned to the author for final approval prior to publication. Responses are published online, alongside the article they address.

Carnegie Council provides an open forum for discussion. Views expressed are not necessarily those of Carnegie Council.

Features

Policy Innovations Online Magazine

The central address for a fairer globalization.
» More

blue dot separator

Ethics & International Affairs

Go to the Journal for articles on ethics and foreign policy.
» More