Self-Defense and the Obligations to Kill and to Die [Abstract]
Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 18.1 (Winter 2004)
February 3, 2004
David Rodin’s book, War and Self Defense, is a subtle and provocative analysis of the claim of self-defense and its relation to modern war. Building on his analysis, I raise some further issues about self-defense as a justification of modern nation state war. Principal among these is what I call the conscription paradox: if the state’s right to make war is grounded in the right of its citizens to self-defense, how do we explain the right of modern states to conscript its citizens into the military -- and order them to die, if need be? This problem has been acknowledged by liberal individual thinkers over the years, but not solved. It raises questions of whether a coherent account of current nation state military practice can be grounded in individual self-defense.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
Read More: Ethics, Warfare, Just War, Intervention, Security, International Relations, National Security, War on Terror
