By Any Name Illegal and Immoral: Response to "Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing"[Abstract]
Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 17.1 (Spring 2003)
March 2, 2003
The argument that this policy affords the public a sense of revenge and retribution could serve to justify acts both illegal and immoral. Clearly, lawbreakers ought to be punished. Yet, no matter how horrific their deeds, as the targeting of Israeli civilians indeed is, they should be punished according to the law. David’s arguments could, in principle, justify the abolition of formal legal systems altogether.
The Israeli government has not endorsed the minor changes of policy that David suggests, and for a reason. Israel’s initial refusal to acknowledge the very existence of this policy and even its later hesitant admission suggest it is aware of the problems the policy entails and of the difficulties of dismissing them. Assassinations have been part of Israel’s security policy for many years, and Israel is currently the only democratic country that regards such measures as legitimate. The Palestinian violations of international law, however, cannot be used to grant legal and/or moral legitimation to these violations when perpetrated by others.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
- Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing [Abstract] (Debate: Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing)
- If Not Combatants, Certainly Not Civilians [Abstract] (Debate: Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing)
Read More: Terrorism, Human Rights, Intervention, Just War, Security, Warfare, Israel

EIA celebrates 25 years, 1987-2011


blog comments powered by Disqus