Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing [Abstract]
Ethics and International Affairs, Volume 17.1 (Spring 2003)
March 2, 2003
Although targeted killing has been pursued by Israel throughout its history, the scale of the present effort and the use of sophisticated military assets such as helicopter gunships and jet fighters set it apart from earlier practices. The effectiveness of the policy is called into doubt because it has not prevented––and may have contributed to––record numbers of Israeli civilians being killed. The policy has also resulted in informers being revealed, intelligence resources diverted, potential negotiating partners eliminated. It has also produced murderous retaliation and international condemnation of Israel. Benefits of the policy include impeding the effectiveness of terrorist operations, keeping terrorists on the run, and deterring some attacks. In addition, it affords the Israeli public a sense of revenge and retribution.
Because it targets the actual perpetrators of terrorism, targeted killing provides a proportionate and discriminate response to the threat Israel faces. Improving the policy will require better civilian oversight, greater care to eliminate harm to innocent bystanders, and refraining from killing political leaders. Despite its many shortcomings, Israel is justified in pursuing this policy so long as it faces a terrorist threat that the Palestinian Authority will not or cannot control.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
- By Any Name Illegal and Immoral: Response to "Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing"[Abstract] (Debate: Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing)
- If Not Combatants, Certainly Not Civilians [Abstract] (Debate: Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing)
Read More: Terrorism, Intervention, Just War, Human Rights, Warfare, Security, Israel

EIA celebrates 25 years, 1987-2011


blog comments powered by Disqus