Striking First: Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict
Michael W. Doyle, Harold H. Koh, Joanne J. Myers
September 23, 2008
Loading the player...
Having trouble with audio or video playback? Click here
Is the Bush Doctrine of aggressive preventive action a justified and legal recourse against threats posed by terrorists and rogue states? Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an attack is in progress?
Related Resources:
- Striking First: Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict (Video)
- Striking First: Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict (Transcript)
Read More: Terrorism, Warfare, Armed ConflictJust War Tradition, Preventive War, U.S. Foreign Policy, War on Terror , , United States
blog comments powered by Disqus