Humanity: Our Priority Now and Always: Response to "Principles, Politics, and Humanitarian Action" [Abstract]

Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 13 (1999)

Humanity: Our Priority Now and Always: Response to Principles, Politics, and Humanitarian Action [Abstract]

Thomas Weiss oversimplifies when he identifies the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) with the classicist position of nonconfrontation. The ICRC defines humanitarian action to include advocacy through public and private channels to protect individuals and communities against violations of international humanitarian law. Weiss rightly points out the difficulty of making belligerents, or "unprincipled actors," understand the value of nonpartisan and impartial action. Still, the ICRC remains committed to finding new language for communicating the principles of humanitarian action and new techniques of negotiation. In this regard the ICRC is classicist. But this classicism places the ICRC on the side of the solidarists in defending the interests of individuals and communities in distress, and on the side of the maximalists in its advocacy of international humanitarian law.

 

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

Read More: Ethics, Intervention, Ethics, Humanitarian InterventionHuman Rights,

blog comments powered by Disqus
In this Issue of the Journal
Join our Mailing Lists
Online Magazine

Online Magazine

Social Network

Social Network

The Journal

The Journal