Moral Choice and the Iran-Iraq Conflict [Abstract]

Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 3 (1989)

Gary Sick Gary Sick

In this analysis of the Iran-Iraq war, Sick asserts that two major naturally wealthy regional powers consciously chose to forego diplomatic means to resolve their disputes. Moreover, by blatantly miscalculating and underestimating the damage of armed engagement, the leaders exhibited utter negligence and disobedience of the international code of conduct. With glaring lack of consideration for human anguish in the military attacks, they used children in battle, launched bombing and missile attacks on civilian targets and neutral shipping, and deployed chemical weapons. Implicated as well is the international community, which did little to stem the bloodshed.

 

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

Read More: Iraq, Religion, Warfare, Armed Conflict, Role of Religion, Iran, Iraq

blog comments powered by Disqus
In this Issue of the Journal
Join our Mailing Lists
Online Magazine

Online Magazine

Social Network

Social Network

The Journal

The Journal

postprandial-ft